EPL: Panel confirms 23 VAR errors, 35% increase this season

Femi Akinyemi

Three additional video assistant referee errors have been confirmed by the Premier League’s Key Match Incidents panel, bringing the total for the season to 23.

The figure represents a 35% rise compared to the same stage last season, when 17 errors were recorded in 2024-25. However, it remains below the 30 errors logged at this point in 2023-24.

The panel identified three penalty-related mistakes, including two cases that should have resulted in spot-kicks for holding offences.

Everton were among the clubs affected, with the panel ruling that they were wrongly denied a penalty against Manchester City. David Moyes’ side led 3-2 at Hill Dickinson Stadium when Bernardo Silva held back Toffees midfielder Merlin Rohl from a corner, an incident missed by referee Michael Oliver.

VAR official Paul Howard judged that the holding occurred before the corner was taken and therefore did not intervene.

ALSO READ: Beckham becomes UK’s first billionaire sportsman

“If that doesn’t get given as a penalty, then it’s an absolute free-for-all from now on,” Moyes said after the game.

All five members of the KMI panel disagreed with the decision, stating “there is a clear, sustained holding offence which continues as the corner is taken and the ball comes into play”.

Manchester City went on to equalise deep into stoppage time through Jeremy Doku, securing a 3-3 draw.

It was the third time this season Everton felt they should have been awarded a penalty through VAR review, following incidents in a 1-0 defeat to Arsenal and a 2-1 loss at West Ham.

The panel also unanimously ruled that a penalty awarded to Bournemouth in their 3-0 win over Crystal Palace should have been overturned. Marcos Senesi went down under contact from goalkeeper Dean Henderson, with VAR Peter Bankes backing referee Rob Jones’ on-field decision.

“Henderson drops the ball, reaches for it and Senesi goes down under very minimal contact from the goalkeeper,” the panel said.

“The referee’s call of a penalty was incorrect and that VAR should have intervened to recommend a review.”

In another case, West Ham were judged to have been denied two penalties in their 3-0 defeat at Brentford. One incident, involving Keane Lewis-Potter and Tomas Soucek, was described as “a clear non-footballing action which impacted the West Ham player’s movement”, with the panel unanimous that VAR Tony Harrington should have intervened.

A separate incident in the 77th minute, when Yehor Yarmolyuk brought down Pablo, produced a split decision, with a 3-2 vote for a penalty but 4-1 against VAR intervention.

Elsewhere, the panel voted 4-1 that VAR was correct not to intervene in a possible handball by Benjamin Sesko before the Manchester United striker scored against Liverpool, noting there was “no conclusive evidence of a handball”.

The VAR decision to award a red card to Sunderland’s Dan Ballard for pulling the hair of Tolu Arokodare was also upheld by a 4-1 majority.

(BBC)

+ posts
TAGGED:
Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Sporting Tribune

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading